Question Catching COVID-19 (Omicron)

[funliness]

The answer to your question can be found in the first paragraph.

Viral Loads Similar Between Vaccinated and Unvaccinated People

A new study from the University of California, Davis, Genome Center, UC San Francisco and the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub shows no significant difference in viral load between vaccinated and unvaccinated people who tested positive for the delta variant of SARS-CoV-2. It also found no significant...

www.ucdavis.edu

Thanks - wonder what the numbers would look like of more sample was from people showing symptoms . Interesting how the article also calls out how serious-illness was less likely amongst those vaccinated

 

[jimmyd]

Good, so you do see the benefit of vaccines.

Why is it that you don't believe or discredit the COVID vaccine?

The same reason that I don’t sign up for drug trials.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[jimmyd]

I don't claim to know everything, if you seemingly know more about Doc Malone than me, power to you little troll. I don't particularly need to nor am I interested in becoming a Doc Malone expert. You can take that win.

No one forced you to comment on Malone, and yet, you did. Why comment on something you don’t know about?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Hornet]

It existed long before Malone used it, and he credited the person who coined it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Prove it!

Because it’s been fact checked and shown not to exist.

 

[Frank Underwood]

Prove it!

Because it’s been fact checked and shown not to exist.

Jimmy doesn't even read the articles he links. I think we all know that by now.

It existed long before Malone used it, and he credited the person who coined it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

From the article you linked, look at the title.



An unfounded theory...

Mass formation psychosis does not exist...

The article you linked is discrediting Doc Malone again Jimmy. Are you running out of sources to back you up?

 

[jimmyd]

Earlier in this thread you said you have no issues with your parents taking the vaccine, are you just a coward then?

You are ok "risking" other's lives and health doing something that you wouldn't do, but you have no issues using your loved ones as Guinea pigs.

It’s all about personal choice. Everyone has to assess their own risk factors and make decisions accordingly. If you have risk factors, as elderly parents do, a vaccine outweighs anything else.

If you’re in good health, as I am, there’s no reason to get the vax. That’s what making your own health decisions entails. Cowardice has nothing to do with it. It’s more intellect than anything.

I had Covid, and now have better immunity than you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[jimmyd]

Prove it!

Because it’s been fact checked and shown not to exist.

Nah, I’ll let the goofballs, that didn’t even listen to the interview, look it up. He says it in the interview.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[jimmyd]

Jimmy doesn't even read the articles he links. I think we all know that by now.



From the article you linked, look at the title.

View attachment 190812

An unfounded theory...

Mass formation psychosis does not exist...

The article you linked is discrediting Doc Malone again Jimmy. Are you running out of sources to back you up?

When did I post that?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[jimmyd]

If it's a personal choice why do you troll the fuck out of this thread with antivaxxer propaganda?

Would you believe such actions are hypocritical?

How is it hypocritical? Did I ever tell anyone not to take the vaccine?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Hornet]

Nah, I’ll let the goofballs, that didn’t even listen to the interview, look it up. He says it in the interview.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Coward

APA Dictionary of Psychology

A trusted reference in the field of psychology, offering more than 25,000 clear and authoritative entries.

dictionary.apa.org

 

[Deleted member 88306]

Another article you linked that you didn't understand. It's as if you link things expecting people not to read and comprehend them.

I'll summarize that article for you. Graphene oxide is an interesting material in sensory applications, due to its low toxicity, flexibility and maluabilility, while having the ability to produce and maintain electric signals. It's like those electrodes doctors put on you to measure your cardiovascular system (ecg) but in saran wrap form.

The invasive applications of it is the embedding of graphene oxide as a sensor in organ implants so they can monitor the health of the organs. The synthetic organs are still connected to external power source and transmission modules.

But the key takeaway is that graphene oxide is a fucking sheet of composite that is connected to other components, it has no ability to to send or process data, required for Bluetooth communication or tracking you dumb fuck.

It's as if you share these articles to scare people with jargon and complex topics and words.

Leave the tech stuff to the professionals and go back to the kiddy pool.

Well this graphene oxide uses ultra sound to transmit data.

 

[jimmyd]

View attachment 190816
Coward

APA Dictionary of Psychology

A trusted reference in the field of psychology, offering more than 25,000 clear and authoritative entries.

dictionary.apa.org

It’s not hard, just listen to the interview.

I love that you’re wrong, but are calling me a coward.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[jimmyd]

Do you think your trolling with antivax propaganda is encouraging anyone to make intelligent choices like the one you made for your parents?

Did you troll your mom and dad with antivax inuendo before you drove them to the vaccination sites?

You didn’t answer the question. Did I ever tell someone not to take the vaccine?

You can’t beat me, bro. But keep bringing it. This is enjoyable.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Hornet]

It’s not hard, just listen to the interview.

I love that you’re wrong, but are calling me a coward.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I called you a coward because you make a claim that should be easy to prove and then when asked to prove it you run and hide. That is your usual tactic. The APA dictionary says the term doesn’t even exist. If it existed they would reference it. Yet you will blindly believe what some guy on a podcast says believing that guys on a podcast never lie.

 

[jimmyd]

I called you a coward because you make a claim that should be easy to prove and then when asked to prove it you run and hide. That is your usual tactic. The APA dictionary says the term doesn’t even exist. If it existed they would reference it.

Nah, I’m not going to do the work for you. You didn’t even listen to the interview, you make stupid, uninformed claims, then want others to show you how you’re wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[jimmyd]

Do you believe that trolling the fuck out of this site with antivaxxer propaganda is conducive to people reading it making intelligent decisions about their vaccination choices similar to the way you decided for your mommy and daddy?

Did you troll the fuck out of your parents prior to taking them to the vaccination sites?

Can you tell me what the conversation with your parents was like, if possible verbatim when you convinced them to take the vax?

I love how angry you get!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Hornet]

Nah, I’m not going to do the work for you. You didn’t even listen to the interview, you make stupid, uninformed claims, then want others to show you how you’re wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So a guy on a podcast makes up a term nobody has ever heard of before in a field (psychology) that he posses absolutely no credentials in (which is why I call him a “guy” and not a doctor in this case since his medical degree is in some completely different area) you and your crew blindly accept it as it supports your narrative without actually fact checking it. As soon as someone fact checks it and calls out your bullshit you put the earmuffs on and go “nah, nah, nah, I’m not listening to you” like a fucking child. Got it, it’s very clear to all of us.

 

[jimmyd]

You avoid the question again. I am not angry at all.

Can you answer the questions?

Do you believe that trolling the fuck out of this site with antivaxxer propaganda is conducive to people reading it making intelligent decisions about their vaccination choices similar to the way you decided for your mommy and daddy?

Did you troll the fuck out of your parents prior to taking them to the vaccination sites?

Can you tell me what the conversation with your parents was like, if possible verbatim when you convinced them to take the vax?

If people are coming to a massage forum for help in making intelligent decisions about their vaccination, they have bigger problems.

My parents, like any other intelligent person, made vaccination their personal decision.

Based on your use of the word, not sure you know what “troll” means.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[jimmyd]

So a guy on a podcast makes up a term nobody has ever heard of before in a field (psychology) that he posses absolutely no credentials in (which is why I call him a “guy” and not a doctor in this case since his medical degree is in some completely different area) you and your crew blindly accept it as it supports your narrative without actually fact checking it. As soon as someone fact checks it and calls out your bullshit you put the earmuffs on and go “nah, nah, nah, I’m not listening to you” like a fucking child. Got it, it’s very clear to all of us.

What did I accept? Did I ever refer to MFP? I’m just pointing out that you guys, demonstrably, don’t know what you’re talking about.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[jimmyd]

There you go with your dictionary ready to spring to action. We are not debating definitions you little troll.

If this is a personal choice for people, and this is not the place to come for information for vaccine choices, will you stop trolling the fuck out of this page with your antivaxxer propaganda?

So we can’t discuss vaccines in a forum? Isn’t that, literally, what a forum is for?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk