Review: Rachel @B&S

[Suz C]

Normally, I head in to B&S with someone specific in mind. Last night, I figured I'd go in for a "crapshoot," and see who was there.

Unfortunately, it didn't turn out terribly well.

Rachel came in, and started the massage. She's a quite pretty brunette; quite well-proportioned. A build very reminiscent of Natasha of Studio B, albeit with slightly smaller, but nice, breasts.

A very light back massage; not bad, but not something worth looking for. (There are a few of the girls there where I'd find it interesting to go "on the cheap" and stop with the "Basic," because the back massage is so good.)

Notably, she didn't do anything with my shoulders, which are probably the area most likely to be somewhat tense, and well worth, from a therapeutic perspective, getting massaged.

Oh, well; if the more "teasing" portion of the massage is good, that'll make up for it.

But it didn't. I wound up moving up to NR, which was almost certainly a mistake, as there wasn't much fun to be had. She was very strict about limitations on "touching policies." There's a way of doing that, and a way of not doing it. Lead me by suggesting I do something else that is within her limits.

Kristy at Studio B is perhaps the best one at teasing around the limits; a couple of times I have thought she was about to do something "oral," and yet am quite sure she consistently stays within SB limitations. But that moment that I'm not sure is quite the treasure :-.

Instead, Rachel, in "NR" mode, was pretty much totally motionless, which is no fun at all.

At that point, when the finish was supremely minimalist, that came as no surprise. (And I was pretty analytical about it; not angry, because it pretty much fit in with everything else.)

The one surprise: I have never seen an MPA at B&S not shower after a session before. Usually the attendant offers a peck on the cheek (or better ) and a hug; no surprise when no such was coming here.

Sande asked how the session was as I was leaving; I indicated that Rachel was , so that it wasn't totally satisfactory.

For her part, Sande offered a free session with someone else. The hour was pretty late, and if unsatisfactorily finished, I was "finished," so I declined. (If Sande offers me a free door fee some time later, that would be cool.)

Perhaps this is a "milage may vary" situation. But others there have been consistently a lot better. I wasn't particularly impressed the time I saw Bianca, but she was certainly not "cold" this way...

 

[kyoote_lao_babe]

A friend of mine had very similar experience.

Call Sande on the phone and talk about it, I am pretty sure she will take care of you.

Sorry to hear about a bad time at B&S.

I have been very lucky and haven't had one yet.

KF

 

[sheldonlinker]

I guess this is a classic case of the "ymmv" I read so much about, because in a very similar scenario I had quite the opposite experience with Rachel. In your defense though Scattered, my visit was 8 months ago, and alot may change in an MPA in that time frame. I reviewed her in this link.

http://www.massageplanet.net.ca/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=&threadid=20739&highlight=Rachael

 

[Holly T]

The current Rachel on the website is different from the one who was there earlier in the year - based on the pics anyways. I remember wanting to see the old Rachel - her pics were incredible. The current Rachel's pics do nothing for me.

 

[Elle B]

Docter,

After posting I went to the B&S website and saw a completely different Rachel. I came back to correct my error, but couldn't get back into massageplanet.net. My apologies for the mix-up.